|
Part
number AB50S was removed from the High Impact Shock test
after blow number six (5 foot drop in top axis) due to damaged mounting threads. All
four (4) mounting threads were found to be damage on part number AB20S after blow number 9
(5 foot drop in side axis). See High Impact Shock test report herein in Appendix B. |
|
This program is
described in detail in section 6.0, herein. |
|
This
test report
represents Independent Testing Laboratories, Inc. findings and conclusions based upon the
conduct of the test and procedures described herein with respect only to the particular
product(s) or component(s) which were provided to Independent Testing Laboratories, Inc.
by the customer for testing and evaluation proposed per written purchase orders,
procedures or verbal instructions. All findings and conclusions set forth herein are
expressly limited by and are subject to the conditions, exceptions, qualifications,
parameters, and limitations described and noted herein. Independent Testing
Laboratories, Inc. hereby expressly disclaims any responsibility of any nature or type
whatsoever with respect to the applicability of the results set forth hereing to products
or components other than the particular product(s) or component(s) which were
actually physically tested by Independent Testing Laboratories, Inc. for purposes of this
test report. This report is furnished for the sole and exclusive use of the customer
and may not be used by or relied upon by any other party in the absence of the express
written consent of Independent Testing Laboratories, Inc. |
|
|
| 6.0 |
REQUIREMENTS, PROCEDURES AND RESULTS |
|
|
| 6.1 |
TEMPERATURE ALTITUDE |
|
|
| 6.1.1 |
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
|
There shall be no visible evidence of damage or deterioration noted as a
result of this test. |
|
|
| 6.1.2 |
TEST PROCEDURE |
|
The test specimens were subjected to the temperature altitude testing
described in Method 504.1, Procedure 1, Category 6 of Reference 2.2, herein. |
|
Functional testing was performed by Martek Power
Abbott personnel during various phases of the test. Test data was recorded on the
appropriate data sheets. All functional testing was performed by Martek Power Abbott
Transistor Labs, Inc. personnel. |
|
The temperature extremes were +71°C and -55°. |
|
The altitude extreme was 70,000 feet. |
|
|
| 6.1.3 |
TEST RESULTS |
|
The specimens met the requirements of paragraph 6.1.1 above. |
|
Data for this test are presented herein in Appendix A.
Photographs for this test are presented herein in Appendix C. |
|
|
| 6.2 |
VIBRATION, SINUSOIDAL CYCLING |
|
|
| 6.2.1 |
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
|
There shall be no visible evidence of damage or deterioration noted as a
result of this test. |
|
|
| 6.2.2 |
TEST PROCEDURE |
|
The specimen was mounted to the vibration exciter by its normal
mounting means and the control accerlerometer was placed on the fixture.
The input was applied
along each of the three (3) mutually perpendicular axes at a sweep rate of 5 Hz to 2000 Hz
in Twenty (20) minutes, with a time duration per axis of three (3) hours, nine (9) hours
total. The input excitation was as follows: |
|
LEVEL (G'S) |
FREQUENCY
(HZ) |
|
0.10"
D.A. |
5
to 14 Hz |
|
±
1.0 G |
14
to 23 Hz |
|
0.036"
D.A. |
23
to 90 Hz |
|
±
15 G |
90
to 2000 Hz |
|
The specimens were operating and continuously recorded on a strip
chart recorder during this test.
All functional testing was performed by Martek Power Abbott Transistor Labs
personnel. All data for functional testing was retained by Martek Power Abbott
Transistor Labs. |
|
|
| 6.2.3 |
TEST RESULTS |
|
The specimens met the requirements of paragraph 6.2.1 above.
Data for this test are presented in
Appendix A. |
|
|
| 6.3 |
SHOCK TEST |
|
|
| 6.3.1 |
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
|
There shall be no visible evidence of damage or deterioration noted as a result of
this test. |
|
|
| 6.3.2 |
TEST PROCEDURE |
|
The specimens were subjected to a Half-Sine Shock Pulse per Method
516.2, Procedure I, amplitude 40 G's and duration of 11 milliseconds (Half-Sine Shock
Pulse configuration). Six (6) shocks per axis, three (3) in each direction, were
applied along three mutually perpendicular axes of the specimens for a total of 18 shocks.
The specimens were
non-operating during this test.
All functional testing
was performed by Martek Power Abbott Transistor Labs personnel. All data for
functional testing was retained by Martek Power Abbott Transistor Labs. |
|
|
| 6.3.3 |
TEST RESULTS |
|
The
specimens met the requirements of paragraph 6.3.1 above.
Data for this test are presented in
Appendix A. |
|
|
|
MIL-STD-810E, Method 513.4, Proc. 3 |
|
|
| 6.4 |
ACCELERATION |
|
|
| 6.4.1 |
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
|
There shall be no visible evidence of damage or deteriortation noted as a
result of this test. |
|
|
| 6.4.2 |
TEST PROCEDURE |
|
The specimens were installed into the test fixture and attached to the
centrifuge.
The input axes were X,
Y, and Z in each direction. The radius was 22.5 inches. The acceleration level
was 14 G's. Test duration was one (1) minute per direction. The R.P.M. for 14
G's was 150.
The specimens were
non-operating during the test.
All functional testing was performed by Martek Power Abbott Transistor Labs
personnel. All data for functional testing was retained by Martek Power Abbott
Transistor Labs. |
|
|
| 6.4.3 |
TEST RESULTS |
|
The specimens met the requirements of paragraph 6.4.1 above.
Data for this test are
presented in Appendix A. |